Legal Challenges Expected for New WOTUS Rule; Supreme Court Precedent Cited
The new Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) rule that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of the Army unveiled on Dec. 11 (GM Dec. 14, p. 1) is likely to face legal challenges in the lower courts and may ultimately by crippled by a U.S. Supreme Court precedent, according to several legal scholars interviewed by Bloomberg Environment.
The new rule, which would replace the contentious 2015 WOTUS definition developed by the Obama-era EPA, significantly narrows the types of water bodies that fall under Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction. Acting EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler said it is “clearer and easier to understand” and will result in “significant cost savings, protect the nation’s navigable waterways, and reduce barriers to important economic and environmental projects.”
According to Bloomberg Law, the Supreme Court opinion in question was written by now-former Justice Anthony Kennedy in the 2006 case Rapanos v. U.S. In that 4-1-4 decision, Kennedy said the CWA applies to water bodies that are navigable or have a “significant nexus” to a navigable water. The Kennedy opinion was used as the basis for the 2015 WOTUS definition, and has been cited by several appeals courts as the key test to determine the federal government’s oversight of rivers, lakes, estuaries, and other bodies of water.
The Trump administration’s proposal to redefine WOTUS separates regulated waters into six categories and emphasizes a “surface connection” to navigable waters, while placing other types of water bodies, such as “ephemeral” streams and roadside or farm ditches, outside of CWA jurisdiction.
According to Bloomberg Law, Dave Ross, the top water official at EPA, told reporters that the new rule doesn’t entirely reject the Kennedy opinion, but instead incorporates narrower language from the late Justice Antonin Scalia in the same Rapanos decision.
But William Buzbee, a law professor at Georgetown University, told Bloomberg Environment that EPA’s new definition is “directly contrary to its own past legal views and what the Supreme Court has very clearly said.”
Blan Holman, an attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center, told Bloomberg Environment that the new definition is “clearly rejecting Kennedy’s ‘significant nexus’ test,” and would result in a majority of the nation’s wetlands falling outside of CWA jurisdiction because they lack a surface connection to navigable waters.
“Every court that’s looked at it said the Kennedy test rules,” Holman told Bloomberg. “To propose a rule that thumbs its nose at the ‘significant nexus’ test is interesting.”
The new WOTUS definition is in response to a February 2017 Executive Order from President Trump (GM March 3, 2017), who indicated quickly after taking office that he intended to revoke and replace the 2015 WOTUS rule. The Trump administration tried to delay the 2015 rule’s compliance deadline while it worked on a new version, but those delays were challenged this summer in court (GM Aug. 24, p. 1). Two recent decisions by U.S. District Courts in South Carolina and Washington have also invalidated the delay.
Because of legal challenges, the 2015 WOTUS rule is currently in effect in only 22 states, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. territories. That patchwork of enforcement is likely to remain the standard for some time, Bloomberg reported.
The new rule is now in a 60-day public comment period, after which the EPA and Army will release the proposal in its final form. Any legal challenges to the rule will be filed only when the final rule is published, Bloomberg reported. As a result, the revised rule is likely to be mired in litigation in the lower courts for years before it ends up at the Supreme Court, if it gets that far.
This lengthy process will be further influenced by the results of the 2020 election. A second term for the Trump administration increases the odds of a Supreme Court review of the rule, but an industry attorney told Bloomberg Law that a Democrat president will have no desire to defend the rule.
The new WOTUS definition is supported by agriculture and industry trade groups, including the National Corn Growers Association (NCGA), The Fertilizer Institute (TFI), and the Agricultural Retailers Association (ARA).