Four members of the U.S. Senate’s Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee introduced bipartisan legislation on Feb. 10 to extend for five years the existing Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS).
U.S. Senators Susan Collins (R-Maine), Ranking Member of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), George Voinovich (R-Ohio) and Mary Landrieu (D-La.) introduced S. 2996, the Continuing Chemical Facilities Antiterrorism Security Act, which would reauthorize the law until 2015. It is now set to expire in October.
The senators said their bill would give the Department of Homeland Security sufficient time to fully implement the CFATS standards that were signed into law in 2006 and took effect in 2007. The chemical and fertilizer industries have voiced support for the existing CFATS standards, and have urged Congress to extend them rather than adopt tougher regulations that were approved last fall by the House of Representatives (GM Nov. 16, 2009).
“The Department of Homeland Security has done a remarkable job developing a comprehensive chemical security program,” said Sen. Collins. “This industry is vital to our country’s economy and important to advancements and innovations in critical fields such as science, technology, agriculture, medicine and manufacturing, but it can also be a dangerous threat in the event of a terrorist attack. That is why it is critical that we enable the Department to continue this important work. The legislation passed by the House of Representatives would unwisely bring this progress to a screeching halt.”
H.R. 2868, the House bill approved on Nov. 6, included several provisions that were roundly criticized by The Fertilizer Institute, the Agricultural Retailers Association and other chemical industry trade groups. Among these was an Inherently Safer Technologies (IST) provision, which would require chemical facilities to assess the viability of switching to safer chemical alternatives. The House bill also contained language allowing citizens to sue DHS for failing to implement the law, and included a petition process through which citizens may request the government to investigate specific facilities.
In her floor statement introducing S. 2996 last week, Sen. Collins was particularly critical of the IST provision in the House bill. “IST is an approach to process engineering involving the use of less dangerous chemicals, less energetic reaction conditions, or reduced chemical inventories,” she said. “It is not, however, a security measure. And because there is no precise methodology by which to measure whether one technology is safer than another, an IST mandate may actually increase or unacceptably transfer the risk to other points in the chemical process or elsewhere on the supply chain.”
Collins also warned that an IST mandate would encourage chemical companies to move their operations overseas, and would affect the availability of several commonly used products. The fertilizer industry has argued that anhydrous ammonia and ammonium nitrate are two products most vulnerable to an IST provision.
“To be clear, some owners and operators of chemical facilities will want to use IST,” Collins said. “But the decision to implement [it] should be that of the owner or operator, not a Washington bureaucrat.” Collins said the existing CFATS rules allow chemical facilities “the flexibility to choose the security measures or programs that the owner or operator of the facilities decides would best address the particular facility and its security risks, so long as these security measures satisfy the department’s 18 performance standards.”
Collins said DHS has received more than $200 million to date to support CFATS, and has hired and trained more than 100 chemical facility field inspectors and headquarters employees since 2007. DHS hopes to employ 260 more by the end of fiscal 2010, she added.
DHS is also well into the tiering process mandated by CFATS, which requires facilities to complete a Top-Screen security vulnerability assessment to determine which plants pose the highest security risk. Collins reported that since the CFATS were established, DHS has reviewed almost 38,000 Top-Screen submissions and notified nearly 7,000 facilities of their high-risk designations and preliminary tiers.
According to the Agricultural Retailers Association, DHS recently notified 544 facilities across the U.S. of their final tiering assignment under the CFATS rules. The Site Security Plans for these 544 facilities will be due to DHS no later than June 1, 2010. ARA said CFATS currently covers some 6,023 facilities, 3,507 of which are final tiered facilities and 2,516 preliminarily tiered facilities. ARA broke down the total number of facilities by tier as follows: Tier 1: 230; Tier 2: 563; Tier 3: 1,231; and Tier 4: 3,999.
The Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Affiliates (SOCMA) last week welcomed the introduction of S. 2996, saying the legislation “will allow chemical companies across the country to continue making important investments to safeguard themselves against a potential terrorist attack.”
“The bipartisan leadership shown by these four senators is precisely what our nation needs when it comes to securing the homeland,” said Bill Allmond, vice president of government relations and chem. stewards at SOCMA. “We applaud them for ensuring the continuation of the comprehensive Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Act Standards. We hope this bill is the start of a new beginning toward a bipartisan solution to a permanent chemical security law.”
A TFI spokesperson expressed some reservations to Green Markets about the bill’s chances, however, saying Senate Democrats may have an added incentive to push through tougher chemical security legislation this year, particularly since other key legislation continues to languish in Congress.